I recently found myself in a debate on a vegan Facebook group. This happens about once a week for me, and it usually involves cat food or omni friendships. The same tired old arguments are rolled out time after time, with photos of someone’s “perfectly healthy vegan cat” from one side and the words “obligate carnivore” from the other, or yet another suggestion for some poor newbie vegan to dump their omni partner for eating cheese.
“Do ‘Vegan Morals’ mean I shouldn’t be an organ donor?”
An issue was raised about organ donation and veganism, which for me is a no-brainer. Much like my reasons for donating blood, it’s something I’ve always felt strongly about, and I have been registered as an organ donor for as long as I can remember. When I became vegan, this didn’t change. Not even for a split moment or a nanosecond did I ever become a self righteous asshole with a superiority complex who wants to pick and choose who I deem ‘worthy’ of receiving my donated organs. Not to mention it’s problematic as hell.
“What if we could choose who our organs would be donated to?”
It seems some vegans feel their organs should only go to fellow plant-based peeps, and that the omnis on the transplant list should wait their turn for a heart or liver from a fellow meat-muncher. They don’t want their precious lungs to save the life of some *gasp* chicken-chomping child, because they wouldn’t be deserving.
Everybody deserves the best health care available to them, regardless of personal lifestyle choices. It doesn’t matter if the recipient of your vegan kidneys, untouched by the taint of processing digested animal products, could one day be a pivotal vegan activist or the doctor who finds a cure to cancer. That person does not need to be exceptional to deserve a chance at a healthy life.
The idea that this could ever happen horrifies me. Aside from the vegan issue, imagine the ramifications of a system where donors were allowed to dictate who COULDN’T receive their organs. Would they stop simply at veganism, or would individuals then be given the option to exclude those of a different race, religion, sexual orientation or gender?
A person who claims they have compassion for animals, but who would be willing to see a human suffer or die rather than receive the care they need just because they eat meat is a hypocrite.
“What if my heart/lungs/liver/kidneys go to a prolific milk-drinking meat-eater?”
It’s ok to have our own morals. It’s also ok to have our own thoughts, views, and opinions without checking them against some mythical vegan moral compass. It essentially just opens ourselves up to judge others for never being “good enough” or “vegan enough”. Organ donation is an incredible, selfless act, and to put qualifiers on it seems a oxymoron.
Organ donation isn’t a vegan issue. Giving your organs willingly to someone who needs them when you no longer have use for them causes no animal exploitation.
So let’s recap; if you are a vegan, and you are in any way concerned that your hypothetical donated organs could save the life of a meat eater and therefore hypothetically cause the suffering of a non-human animal, you need to get a grip. If you are able to consider the very real possibility that another human might need your donated organs, and are still happy to withhold them because of their personal lifestyle choices, then you are a jerk. You are not vegan. You are not compassionate. And you really need to rethink your priorities.